Why Facebook, Google Advertising During 2016 Presidential Election Lacked Paid-For Disclaimers

Inventor Of 'Back To The Future' Car Gets Bio Pic


A Virginia Tech research team has recently released details from their investigation on the roles that Facebook and Google played in digital advertising around the U.S. presidential election in
2016. The tech companies reportedly stopped the Federal Election Commission’s efforts to regulate digital political advertising at that time.

Since the election, both companies have made
political ad spend more transparent by creating reports that list the
organization paying for the ads. Both companies also created political searchable
ad-buying guidelines
 rather than posting the paid-for disclaimer in the ad.

Katherine Haenschen, an assistant professor of communication in the College of Liberal Arts and Human
Sciences at Virginia Tech, and Jordan Wolf, a 2018 graduate in Virginia Tech’s master’s program in communication, collaborated on academic research to determine why Facebook and Google sought
disclaimers and why the independent regulatory agency failed to regulate digital ads — including search ads — leading up to the election.

advertisement

advertisement

Their study — recently published by
Telecommunications Policy, the International Journal of Digital Economy, Data Sciences and New Media — suggests the two companies forced the Federal Election Commission to deadlock
along partisan lines, making it impossible to grant or deny an exemption to an emerging policy that provides greater transparency.

The research states the two platforms refused to change their
ad size to include the disclaimer. It also suggests the both did this to “maximize profit,” using “technological constraints as an excuse for noncompliance — or a lack of
willingness to change advertisement sizes to accommodate disclaimers.”

Facebook and Google emphasize profit in their reasons for not complying or being unable to comply.

“[Google
and Facebook said] they’re in the business of selling digital ads and they shouldn’t need to create a different product to comply with FEC guidelines for political advertisers to use,” Haenschen said
in a video.

Haenschen also said she does not think there will be any meaningful legislation before the next
presidential cycle. 

The Federal Election Commission voted to confirm that a link from the ads to information on each company’s website tates a full disclaimer was good enough to
satisfy the commission’s requirements. The three Republicans on the FEC supported an exemption, while the two Democrats and an Independent found no technological justification. The vote left
others with little guidance on how to comply with digital political advertising.

The research team analyzed digitized versions of documents and searched through advisory opinions, which are
official FEC responses to questions about the application of federal campaign finance law to specific situations.



0 I like it
0 I don't like it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *